CompliHub is a single platform that runs your quality, environmental and occupational health & safety management systems together — so evidence is a by-product of doing the work, not a separate project before every audit.
They fail because the evidence that they were careful lives in eleven different places. The work was done. Proving it was done, in the order it was supposed to be done, by people authorised to do it, is a separate project — and it is the project that consumes the fortnight before every audit.
A findings spreadsheet, a shared drive of signed PDFs, a training register in HR's system, a CAPA tracker owned by one person. Every one of them has to say the same thing on audit day. The reconciliation is manual, so for most of the year at least one is wrong.
The permit was approved at 06:40 by phone. The signature was added later, in good faith. Every part of that sequence is normal, and none of it is defensible when an investigator asks how the authorisation is evidenced.
Who may close a major nonconformity? Who may release nonconforming product on concession? Where the system of record is a spreadsheet, there is nothing that could have refused.
A row says approved_by: 4471. It does not say what user 4471 believed they were attesting to, whether they were reviewing content or accepting responsibility, or what the record said at that moment.
A fortnight of senior time before every certification and surveillance audit — six people, two weeks, reconstructing what was already done.
Findings that stay open because nobody owns the clock, and nobody can see the clock.
A second plant that cannot be compared to the first, because neither counts the same things the same way.
The audit finding you did not need to take, because the evidence existed and could not be produced in the room.
Not an activity that follows it. If the permit is issued in the system, the approval trail already exists. If the finding is raised from the checklist item, the link to its evidence already exists. Nothing has to be assembled later, because nothing was ever apart.
A certification auditor, a factory inspector and an FDA investigator are asking for the same five things in three vocabularies. A system that gets the architecture right satisfies all three audiences at once.
Every record carries its actor. Approvals snapshot the signer's name and title at signing time. Authorisation is enforced, not merely recorded.
State transitions are transactional services with explicit guards. A step that is not the current pending step cannot be actioned.
For regulated records, one of five declared meanings rendered into a declaration and frozen onto the signature at signing time.
Approved revisions are immutable. A correction is a new revision, sequentially approved, with the whole history retained and readable.
Every list is searchable, filterable, exportable to CSV. The revision effective on a date three years ago is still there, with its approval chain.
These are not features on a comparison grid. They are the reason the evidence is trustworthy when someone finally reads it.
The same rules apply in the screen, the query, the export and the admin console. There is no back door that a report can walk through. Hiding a button is not authorisation.
Sequential approvals that refuse out-of-order decisions, refuse self-approval, and refuse to route when no approver is configured. It never auto-approves and never picks a default.
Nothing submitted, approved or effective is quietly edited or deleted. A correction is a new revision, with the whole history retained. The revision that was effective on a date three years ago is still retrievable.
Not a log somebody remembered to write. The trail is produced by the same transaction that changed the record, with the acting user on it. Downloads of controlled copies are logged separately.
Every operational record is site-scoped, enforced by a registry. A regression test fails the build if a module is added without registering. Corporate sees all sites; a plant sees its own.
Permit forms, approval matrices, check sheets and email templates are edited by your administrators. Versioned — a permit already issued always shows the form it was issued against.
Every state change is an explicit transactional service with guards. It either happens completely or not at all. No silent no-op, no bypassed guard from a new caller.
Ask questions about your compliance posture in plain language. Get answers grounded in your own live data — findings, documents, permits, audit results — scoped to what you are allowed to see.
"Which ISO 45001 clauses apply to our permit process?" — ComplianceBuddy answers using context pulled from your live system, not a generic knowledge base.
Every response is bounded by the user's access rights and the active site. It cannot reveal records or modules the user does not have permission to see.
Powered by Azure OpenAI. Your data stays within your Azure tenant. No training on your data, no third-party model access. Configurable per deployment.
ComplianceBuddy pulls context from your actual findings, documents, permits, audit results, compliance evaluations and more — giving answers grounded in reality, not theory.
Every module shares the same authorisation, approval, notification and audit-trail infrastructure. A module that is off is hidden from the sidebar and blocked at the controller for every user.
Two screens sit in the platform base: the compliance dashboard (a weighted score per site, ranked by what would move it) and audit readiness (the questions each inspector asks and the screen that answers each). Both read across modules and are worth more with each one added.
Coverage statements are traceable to the product's maintained clause-mapping documents. The gaps are stated in writing, not hidden until month four.
| Framework | Position |
|---|---|
| ISO 9001 / 14001 / 45001 | Mapped clause by clause, with the gaps named in the mapping document |
| Factories Act 1948 · OSH Code 2020 | The statutory register layer a labour inspector opens first |
| Water Act · Air Act · EP Act · Waste Rules | Consents and their conditions, the annual returns, environmental clearance — mapped duty by duty |
| 29 CFR 1910.119 (PSM) | 10 of 14 elements. We say which four, in writing |
| 21 CFR Part 11 | No product is compliant — half of Part 11 is procedural. We state what ships, what is yours, and what is being built |
| ISO/IEC 17025 | Covered in half — the predictable half. The laboratory verdict is not ours |
| ICH Q7 · Schedule M | Electronic batch record, lot genealogy, recall — the manufacturing record, not the laboratory |
| Not in the product | LIMS. Payroll, wages and attendance. Written lock-out/tag-out procedures per machine. Said before you find out yourself |
Everything we claim is in writing. The white paper maps 17 frameworks clause by clause — including the rows where we fall short.
19 slides covering the problem, the architecture, the module map, implementation timeline and commercials. The same deck we present in every first meeting.
Download PDF45 pages. Fourteen sections covering why compliance fails, the design decisions, all 45 modules, clause-by-clause coverage for ISO 9001/14001/45001, statutory safety, pollution control board returns, 21 CFR Part 11, and the twelve questions to ask any vendor.
Download PDFEach phase is a vertical slice that goes live rather than a layer that waits. Implementations fail when everything is configured before anything is used.
Sites, departments, users, roles, access matrix. The site boundary is real from day one, so a later plant is an addition, not a migration.
The workflow with the sharpest daily pain — usually Permit to Work, Findings or Documents — genuinely in production with real users.
Findings, root cause, CAPA, effectiveness verification. Every other module now has somewhere to send a problem.
Controlled documents, audit programme, objectives, management review — the certification-facing spine.
Incidents, MOC, HAZOP, PSSR, occupational health, BBS, emergency preparedness — as licensed.
Audit administration, certification prep, chasing open actions, compiling management reports, permit paperwork — as people × hours × occurrences, at your loaded cost per hour.
Only activities from modules you are actually licensing can appear. A saving from a module you did not buy is how a deal dies at the second meeting.
Year one benefit is discounted for realisation: nobody gets the full benefit while the old spreadsheet is still open "just in case".
You leave the meeting with the model populated with your numbers, and you are free to argue with every one of them.
Use these on us and on everyone else you are evaluating. Ask for the answers in writing. The last four are the ones most vendors will not put in writing at all.
One register, one severity scale, one aging clock, one closure rule. Findings raise from every module through the same path.
No. Self-approval is refused in the service layer, and a major NC requires an approved root cause and CAPA before closure.
Approved revisions are immutable. Every historical version stays retrievable, with its approval history.
The system refuses to route and says so. It does not auto-approve and does not pick a default.
No. Enforced in one place, across a registry of every operational model, with a regression test that fails the build.
Your administrators, from inside the application, at no cost. Configurations are versioned, so a permit already issued still shows the form it was issued against.
Standard PostgreSQL, documented schema, CSV export on every list within the user's own authorisation. No proprietary format and no exit toll.
For regulated records, one of five declared meanings, rendered into a declaration and frozen onto the signature at signing time.
No — and neither is any product, because half of Part 11 is procedural. We state what ships, what is yours, and what is being built. We will hand your QA team the full internal gap analysis.
17 frameworks, 9 mapping documents, gaps declared. Available to your evaluation team on request — including the sections where they say we fall short.
A complete list with what we recommend instead for each item. Published honestly, not hidden until month four of your implementation.
A joint deliverable with a named owner on each side. We supply requirements and design inputs, the automated test suite as OQ raw material. We do not claim to hand you a validated system.
We published questions 9 to 12 because they are the questions we are most confident answering — and because a vendor who answers "yes, we are Part 11 compliant" to question 9 has told you something important about every other answer they gave you.
Conventional, boring, well-understood technology. A deliberate choice for a system a plant will run for a decade.
We design and deliver intelligent, scalable, and user-focused software that simplifies complexity and accelerates growth.
Founded in 2016, Deepak Cybit is a software development and industry-specific applications provider based in Vadodara, Pune and Mumbai. Combining deep industry expertise with sharp design and engineering, our team builds tools that go beyond functionality — they empower organisations to operate smarter.
From automating legacy systems to enhancing safety and R&D processes, we help you lead in the age of digital transformation. Our technology is reliable, intuitive, and designed to evolve with your business.
We empower businesses through purpose-driven digital solutions — fusing intelligent design, seamless functionality, and deep domain expertise to create experiences that inspire, engage, and transform.
To become a trusted leader in digital transformation — empowering industries through innovative, impactful, and visually intelligent solutions that inspire confidence and deliver measurable value.
We aim to consistently exceed client expectations by delivering intelligent, user-first solutions — building long-term partnerships rooted in trust, innovation, and a shared drive for meaningful outcomes.
Comprehensive EHS, Quality & Compliance management. One web application running quality, environmental and occupational health & safety systems together.
Laboratory information management system for specifications, samples, test results and certificates of analysis.
Idea to Plant — a comprehensive R&D management solution covering the innovation pipeline.
EHS management solutions for organisations focused on occupational health and workplace safety.
A single source of truth for meetings and discussions — AI-powered meeting intelligence.
Not a slide deck. A working session against your own material. Bring one real permit, one real finding with its CAPA, and one real SOP revision — and we will run them end to end.
One complete workflow end to end, on your terms — the one you named on the call, not our favourite screen.
Ask the four questions. Try to break the authorisation. Ask for a record we have not prepared.
A scoped quotation and a benefit case built from your own numbers, inside a week.